Last edited by Gojin
Sunday, November 8, 2020 | History

5 edition of Thinking outside the box in multilateral disarmament and arms control negotiations found in the catalog.

Thinking outside the box in multilateral disarmament and arms control negotiations

  • 224 Want to read
  • 10 Currently reading

Published by UNIDIR in Geneva, Switzerland .
Written in English

    Subjects:
  • Disarmament,
  • Arms control

  • Edition Notes

    StatementJohn Borrie and Vanessa Martin Randin, editors
    ContributionsBorrie, John, 1974-, Randin, Vanessa Martin, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research
    Classifications
    LC ClassificationsJZ5625 .T46 2006
    The Physical Object
    Paginationxv, 254 p. :
    Number of Pages254
    ID Numbers
    Open LibraryOL17211374M
    ISBN 109290451874
    ISBN 109789290451877


Share this book
You might also like
Peas and carrots

Peas and carrots

22 Days in the Rockies

22 Days in the Rockies

The Book of Life

The Book of Life

third national cancer survey

third national cancer survey

Middle school classroom: RX for success

Middle school classroom: RX for success

The institutional dimension of the European Unions area of freedom, security, and justice

The institutional dimension of the European Unions area of freedom, security, and justice

IRM vision 21

IRM vision 21

The organization of business interests in the UK food processing industry

The organization of business interests in the UK food processing industry

Camel-bells of Baghdad

Camel-bells of Baghdad

From Rhodesia to Zimbabwe

From Rhodesia to Zimbabwe

A Womans Book of Rituals & Celebrations

A Womans Book of Rituals & Celebrations

The Glory Part 2 of 2

The Glory Part 2 of 2

Journal

Journal

State of Kentucky. In General Assembly.

State of Kentucky. In General Assembly.

Guyana, post report

Guyana, post report

Thinking outside the box in multilateral disarmament and arms control negotiations Download PDF EPUB FB2

Get this from a library. Thinking outside the box in multilateral disarmament and arms control negotiations. [John Borrie; Vanessa Martin Randin; United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research.;] -- Success in multilateral disarmament and arms control negotiations has been scarce in recent years.

There is need for new approaches -- to "think outside the box. Until recently, thinking in disarmament and arms control was focused on security concepts dominated by external threats to states, especially from other states.

These orthodox approaches have been found wanting in the face of new international security challenges. Indeed, the majority of. another, and to the broader themes of “thinking outside the box” in multilateral disarmament work.

INTRODUCTION Multilateral negotiations are unusual and, in many ways, remarkable social phenomena. Most human activities involving large numbers of people in making collective decisions are either zero-sum events (like battles, sports.

Thinking Outside the Box in Multilateral Disarmament and Arms Control Negotiations This volume offers new practical tools and perspectives to inform and help the ongoing efforts of multilateral disarmament practitioners, drawing from a range of contributors in civil society, diplomacy, and the policy and research : Jim Church.

Success in multilateral disarmament and arms control negotiations has been scarce in recent years. There is need for new approaches—to “think outside the box”—in order to. Disarmament as Humanitarian Action: From Perspective to Practice Related Publications Alternative Approaches in Multilateral Decision Making: Disarmament as Humanitarian Action, Thinking Outside the Box in Multilateral Disarmament and Arms Control Negotiations, The Value of Diversity in Multilateral Disarmament Work.

Outside the Box in Multilateral Disarmament and Arms Control Negotiations, despite the often repeated cry that “one size does not fi t all”, precedent exerts a strong hold on disarmament. RETHINKING MULTILATERAL NEGOTIATIONS: DISARMAMENT AS HUMANITARIAN ACTION.

John Borrie Increasing attention has been focused in recent years on the need for multilateral negotiation processes in the disarmament and arms control field to “think outside the box” in addressing contemporary challenges. Approaches in Multilateral Decision Making: Disarmament as Humanitarian Action.

The second publication, Disarmament as Humanitarian Action: From Perspective to Practice, was published in The third volume of research papers, Thinking Outside the Box in Multilateral Disarmament and Arms Control Negotiations, was published at the end of Get this from a library. Thinking outside the box in multilateral disarmament and arms control negotiations.

[John Borrie; Vanessa Martin Randin; United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research.;]. Costs of Disarmament: Cost Benefit Analysis of SALW Destruction versus Storage. Geneva: UNIDIR. More information; Borrie, John and Vanessa Martin Randin, eds. Thinking Outside the Box in Multilateral Disarmament and Arms Control Negotiations.

Geneva: UNIDIR. More information; Peartree, C. Edward. Arms control, disarmament and the United Nations Union and the United States during the Cold War on intermediate range and strategic forces, but even multilateral regimes like the NPT, CWC, BTWC and the various regional NWFZ—were negotiated outside the UN framework, such as in the Conference on Disarmament.

At one level, this is of course Size: KB. Thinking Outside the Box in Multilateral Disarmament and Arms Control Negotiations This volume offers new practical tools and perspectives to inform and help the ongoing efforts of multilateral disarmament practitioners, drawing from a range of contributors in civil society, diplomacy, and the policy and research : Jim Church.

Borrie, J. and Randin, V. Martin (eds), (a) Thinking Outside the Box in Multilateral Disarmament and Arms Control Negotiations, December, United Nations.

Google Scholar Borrie, J. and Randin, V. Martin (eds), (b) Disarmament as Humanitarian Action: From Perspective to Practice, May, United by: 5. The revised and updated edition of Arms Control: The New Guide to Negotiations and Agreements contains the most authoritative and comprehensive survey ever published of the documents related to arms control.

All major agreements reached since the second half of the nineteenth century through to mid are critically analysed and by:   It includes the nature of the weapon, the number of weapons used, the way the weapon is used, and the victim’s vulnerability.

Coupland and Taback describe their model in a chapter of our third volume of research (“Thinking Outside the Box in Multilateral Disarmament and Arms Control Negotiations”).

Thinking outside the box in multilateral disarmament and arms control negotiations by John Borrie () 7 editions published in in English and. Success in multilateral disarmament and arms control negotiations has been scarce in recent years.

There is need for new approaches--to "think outside the box"--in order to make them work better because continued failure has real human costs. Outside the Box The UN Conference on Disarmament is the UN’s multilateral disarmament forum based in Geneva (UNOG).

It has been in existence since and has seen successes (UNOG), but it has been thoroughly deadlocked for the past 20 years (Swissinfo ).

“Disarmament as Humanitarian Action: Making Multilateral Negotiations Work”. Based on the recognition that a greater humanitarian focus is relevant to disarmament and arms control processes, the project is concerned with developing practical proposals on how humanitarian perspectives can be applied in functional terms to assist negotiators.

Disarmament as humanitarian action: from perspective to practice. United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research. Borrie, J. and Randin, V.M., Thinking outside the box in multilateral disarmament and arms control negotiations (Vol.

United Nations Publications UNIDIR. Bohlen, A., The rise and fall of arms control. Gotlieb (), p. ; Goldblat (), p. 99; Kislyak (b), p. The violationn of the treaty by the construction of the Krasnoyarsk radar has been corrected throughh dismantling Author: Mika Nishimura.

disarmament and arms control work and proposing new ways these approaches could assist multilateral processes, and second, examining multilateral negotiating processes more broadly toAuthor: Nicholas Wheeler.

(Click on the cover of the book at the bottom of the left column) D. Prins, “Engineering progress: a diplomat’s perspective on multilateral disarmament”, in J. Borrie & V. Martin Randin (eds.), Thinking Outside the Box in Multilateral Disarmament and Arms Control Negotiations, Geneva: UNIDIR:pp.p This topic was first included on the disarmament agenda in South Africa acting on behalf of the Movement of Non-Aligned Countries (NAM), introduced a draft resolution entitled “Promotion.

Success in multilateral disarmament and arms control negotiations has been scarce in recent years. There is need for new approaches—to “think outside the box”—in order to make them work better because continued failure has real human costs. This volume offers new practical tools and perspectives.

The Crisis of Nuclear Disarmament and Arms Control: Diagnosis and Future Concepts «thinking outside the box» is an almost existential imperative, powers do not fulfil their legal obligation to pursue – and conclude – multilateral negotiations for nuclear disarmament, despite their repeated statements to achieve.

Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) Janu This is a multilateral treaty that requires, within a certain timeframe, the ultimate destruction of chemical weapons and the prohibition of development, production, stockpiling and use of chemical weapons.

English Thinking Outside the Box in Multilateral Disarmament and Arms Control Negotiations, by John Borrie and Vanessa Martin Randin (eds.) more_vert open_in_new Link.

Updated online November 5, ENDNOTES 1. Real-world threats have fortunately matured less quickly than feared by the Rumsfeld Commission. Nevertheless, after test-firing long-range Taepo Dong missiles several years ago, North Korea is now reported to be testing a rocket engine for missiles with a range of almost 7, kilometers (4, miles), and Iran has developed a.

Security of journalists: making the case for modeling armed violence as a means to promote human security – Thinking outside the box in multilateral disarmament and arms control negotiations Jan. Thinking Outside the Box in Multilateral Disarmament and Arms Control Negotiations This volume offers new practical tools and perspectives to inform and help the ongoing efforts of multilateral disarmament practitioners, drawing from a range of contributors in civil society, diplomacy, and the policy and research : Anne Zald.

Thinking Outside the Box in Multilateral Negotiations () offered new practical tools and perspectives to assist the ongoing work of multilateral disarmament practitioners.

Current work [ edit ] An important emphasis of the DHA [1] project’s work in is to communicate its research findings to multilateral practitioners. arms control and disarmament diplomacy attach to nuclear weapons, new strategies based on ‘humanitarian action’ and delegiti- mizing nuclear deterrence doctrines have begun to be employed to pave the way for multilateral negotiations on a comprehensive treaty or framework of agreements to accomplish the internationally-supported objective of a world.

Arms control is a term for international restrictions upon the development, production, stockpiling, proliferation and usage of small arms, conventional weapons, and weapons of mass destruction. Arms control is typically exercised through the use of diplomacy which seeks to impose such limitations upon consenting participants through international treaties and.

Thinking outside the box in multilateral disarmament and arms control negotiations: Travaux de recherche: The Treaty of Pelindaba on the African nuclear-weapon-free-zone: Ukraine's non-nuclear option: Unacceptable harm: a history of how the treaty to ban cluster munitions was won.

Arms Control Versus Disarmament There is a difference between conceiving of arms control as a means to achieve a larger goal and seeing arms control as an end unto itself.7 The arms control process is intended to serve as a means to enhance a state’s na-tional security.

Arms control is but one approach to achieve that goal. Arms. The NPT Review Conference and the Future of the Nonproliferation Regime With tensions between Moscow and Washington precluding any new arms control agreements and no multilateral disarmament negotiations in sight, non-nuclear-weapon states accuse the nuclear haves of “discrimination, hypocrisy, and failure to live up to their.

The eventual ripeness of legally binding arms control agreements also will depend on pursuing negotiations cooperatively rather than in the very adversarial style that characterized much of the U.S.-Soviet and U.S.-Russian arms control experience.

Multilateral efforts, such as working to achieve the entry into force of the Comprehensive Test. The U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency (ACDA) was an independent agency of the United States government that existed from to Its mission was to strengthen United States national security by "formulating, advocating, negotiating, implementing and verifying effective arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament policies, strategies, and Preceding agency: U.S.

Department of State: U.S. Thinking Outside the Box in Multilateral Disarmament and Arms Control Negotiations - United Nations Institute for Disarmament Reseach (UNIDIR) In latethe United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) began a research project entitled Disarmament as Humanitarian Action: Making Multilateral Negotiations Work (DHA).

Cave, R. () ‘Disarmament as Humanitarian Action? Comparing Negotiations on Anti-personnel Mines and Explosive Remnants of War’, in J. Borrie and V. Martin Randin (eds.) Thinking Outside the Box in Multilateral Disarmament and Arms Control Negotiations, Geneva: UNIDIR.

Google ScholarCited by: 2. Arms control and Disarmament 2. and unilateral,bilateral, or multilateral. It is a process of jointlymanaging the weapons-acquisition processes of theparticipant states in the hope of reducing the risk of war Arms control [refers] to formal agreements imposingsignificant restrictions or limitations on the weapons or securitypolicies of.